Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

5 Ways to Shape the Soul of the Internet

Posted on Dec 3rd, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin
On my journeys through the 'net I came across a very interesting article by Alexandra Samuel, CEO of Social Signal, that brings together some strands worth looking deeper into:
What kinds of choices can create a relationship to the Internet that supports positive personal and social change? Let me propose a starter list of principles:
  • Give your attention to sites, people and organizations that reflect your true values. When I talked about the Soul of Money with my husband, he summed up his own approach to values-based spending with the following: "every dollar you spend on something is a vote to have more of that thing in the world". On the Internet, every page you load is a vote to have more of that kind of content, or more of that kind of interaction. That doesn't mean a diet of digital granola: you can have your virtual froot loops, too. But try redirecting your video surfing to indie films instead of gossip clips, or sending a personal hello instead of a generic Facebook poke.
  • Find love online. Love online can't be relegated to match.com. We need to bring the very highest qualities of empathy, respect and affection to our online interactions...in as many contexts as possible. The Buddhist practice of metta -- meditation to foster loving kindness in ourselves and the world -- counsels us to begin by meditating with love towards ourselves, our family, and our dearest friends, and gradually expand that attitude of love to encompass a larger and larger circle, and eventually the world. We can use the Internet to entrench and amplify our confrontational and hostile social dynamics. Or we can make our online interactions a practice in loving kindness by approaching each online interaction, even writing each e-mail message, as if it were an affectionate encounter with a dear friend. Yes, we need to be sensibly discreet and protective in an environment that is currently rampant with abuse, fraud and predation -- but caution can co-exist with connection, and even hostility can be met with empathy and kindness. Indeed, with the amount of time we now spend online, we can't afford to spend it in a mindset of suspicion; we must find ways of experiencing our online hours as a practice in forging and deepening relationships.
  • Let down your guard. We live in a fairly guarded society. From locked doors and car alarms to invitation-only parties and call screening, our physical spaces and social practices often serve to keep people out rather than bring them in. The anonymity of the Internet, and many of the emergent pathologies that anonymity makes possible, have led many Internet users to be even more guarded online than they are in their offline lives. Guarded equals disconnected; every wall we put up makes it harder to discover new people, ideas or experiences. But anonymity affords a certain kind of safety, too: a safety in which new levels of candor and connectedness can thrive. Indeed, if you talk to people who enjoy spending a lot of time online, they will often tell you how much they treasure anonymity (or degrees thereof) because it frees them to have honest conversations or forge deep friendships in the absence of superficial social judgements. Experiment to find out whether your truest self emerges from anonymity, or from disclosure. Embrace the Internet as a place where you can be more honest (but with kindness) or more transparent (but with some discretion) and thus experience a new kind of social intimacy. Put more of yourself out there, and let in more of other people by absorbing other people's blog posts, videos, photos and ideas without the social filters that often shape our in-person perceptions of others. Personal transparency builds interpersonal trust, and interpersonal trust builds social capital.
  • Give as good as you get. There's a reason a lot of people describe social media or Web 2.0 as "user-contributed media". A lot of the sites you now enjoy -- whether it's Flickr, YouTube or Boing Boing -- are driven by regular folks (or at least, one-time regular folks). That spirit of contribution is the cultural shift that we need social media to nurture; to transform us from a disconnected culture of passive TV consumers to an awake and alive community of creative expression. So don't engage with the Internet as a passive consumer: embrace and nurture the spirit of expressive and contribution by participating actively yourself.
  • Fuse the power of money and technology. The soul of the Internet is not just analogous to the soul of money; they're interconnected. The Internet is our bank, our shopping mall, our charity box. Taking our financial transactions, shopping and giving online is an opportunity to transform our dysfunctional experiences on those fronts into more meaningful and effective interventions. You can shop at Etsy instead of Overstock, or supplement habitual workplace charitable giving with personal investments on Kiva.
The whole post here
Access_public Access: Public 3 Comments Print views (251)  

Integral Community Building & Collaboration Ecology 01

Posted on Dec 10th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin
Fractal_image_of_patterns_within_patterns
I'll be posting some thoughts I'm having that'll probably be incorporated into an upcoming article.

The Knowledge Age


The industrial age is slowly being replaced by what has been called the informational age. With the advance of the Internet information is turned into knowledge by millions day and night - knowledge being information that is useful for deciding, acting upon, or composing further or new knowledge. The knowledge-age will most likely in due time give way to an age of understanding, as the knowledge that is being gathered and created worldwide becomes understanding; for it is understanding, not knowledge, that allows us to conceive, anticipate, evaluate and judge matters. Eventually we might even reach an age of wisdom as our understanding becomes guided by deep purpose, by ethics, principles, and appreciative inquiry into the sources, heritage and future of humanity and planet.

Still living in the information- and at the beginning of the knowledge-age we are living with information that is valued on the basis of being separable, objective, linear, mechanistic, and measurable, and that is being thought of and treated as a scarce resource which often enough is made scarce by laws shielding it against free dissemination[1]F; whereas actually information and knowledge's basic characteristic is one of abundance - it doesn't become less by being used and actually profits from free and large dissemination[2]F.

A growing number of people are discovering creative and new ways to handle knowledge. They recognize that knowledge creation, meaning and use are dynamic processes that emerge from interactions between people in communities and social structures. The Internet, and in particular values-based social and collaboration networks invigorate peer-to-peer learning and knowledge creation. This potentially creates the possibility of an economy not based on scarcity, leveling the field in which people can participate. In a knowledge based economy success is not the result of collections (of information or goods) but of connections.



Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5

[1] For instance, instead of using restrictive copyrights we could create rights that would share eventual profits created through or from a piece of information fairly to everybody involved in its creation. (This is assuredly difficult but not beyond possibility.)

[2] The Open Source movement in software, the Wikipedia, social networks, the peer2peer movement etc. are great examples for the accelerating abundance that shared knowledge enables us to create together.
Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print views (192)  

Integral Community Building & Collaboration Ecology 02

Posted on Dec 11th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin
Image002

Community & Collaboration


A human community in its very essence is a network of conversations. Communities are held together by the stories they tell, to each other and to the outside world, and by the beliefs they share -- even though opinions might greatly differ. The emergence of a global civilization or community is therefore much more a result of global conversations that the Internet has made possible (for instance, the rise of the so-called blogosphereF[1]F and the ever increasing number of social networks) than the rising tides of globalization, which is solely thought of in economic terms.

Memory and language are often regarded as distinguishing characteristics of human beings. When humanity started to use language, information and knowledge could much easier be shared, a development that led to a leap in societal diversity and complexity. The next leap was caused by the invention of writing and the one after that by the discovery of mathematics. A greater leap in societal diversity and complexity was fostered by the invention of the printing press, hugely enhancing the possibility to store information and knowledge. The telegraph, the telephone, television, multimedia, the Internet, all these developments exponentially furthered diversity and complexity of our societies and of the conversations that are now possible. Our capacity to tell stories, store, spread, create and manifest them is growing exponentially, and so is diversity and complexity, both developments go hand in hand.

Where in the past there was usually enough time for societies and communities to catch up turning knowledge into understanding and eventually wisdom, this seems to be impossible today for who could keep up with the exponential growth of information and knowledge, diversity and complexity in human societies? But this is only so if we see this development from an individual's point of view. If on the other hand we regard humanity as a whole, being comprised of an ever expanding number of diverse communities, then the potential of this evolution is becoming apparent. We are facing an unprecedented challenge, because to turn the vastly growing knowledge into know-how, understanding and eventually wisdom we absolutely need to create forms and processes to coherently activate our collective and collaborative intelligence, and we need to do so on all levels and every scale.

Collaboration is easily confused with but greatly differs from cooperation. When people, organizations or companies cooperate they don't need to jointly develop shared understandings and trust; it is enough that participants, for instance, simply execute instructions willingly or do what they agreed upon previously. The desired outcome is relatively clear, whereas in collaboration it is mostly unpredictable, and collaborators more often than not embark upon a path of innovation and creation which will lead them they know not where.
Clearly collaboration is a much more complex and demanding process than cooperation, and this so also because it needs to rely on trust and on a joint commitment to shared understandings or values.
F[2]F As such it is a process that already embarks from within a situation that is full of diversity and complexity, and therefore it is also a process whose time has come in an age of its inevitable exponential growth as I've shown above.



Part 1
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5

[1] The whole of what is being published in blogs providing commentary or news on particular subjects or functioning more like personal online diaries. A typical blog combines text, images, and links to other blogs, web pages, and other media related to its topic. The ability for readers to leave comments in an interactive format is an important part of many blogs. Most blogs are primarily textual, although some focus on art, photographs, videos (often called vlog), music, audio (called podcasting) and are part of a wider network of social media. The global blogosphere consists of approximately 250 million blogs.

[2] It is equally important to differentiate what in this article is understood as collaboration from what is seen as such in the Internet. If you google collaboration you will get around 167 million documents to choose from. Skimming the first 100 or so it seems obvious that collaboration is generally regarded as - the sum of all logical and target group oriented workflows in and between companies - to cite one document. The 'net is full of so called collaboration-software and tools. But it is very clear that what is regarded as collaboration is what we covered above as being cooperation, "working together on something", where it could simply be enough to execute instructions willingly.

Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print views (309)  

My Daemon

Posted on Dec 11th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin
Having seen "The Golden Compass" and thoroughly enjoyed it - C4Chaos has a wonderful review on his blog - I went over to the website to find out what my daemon would be - and it is... Well, crows played a big part in what I call my Grand Delusionment, so it's only fitting.
Access_public Access: Public 2 Comments Print views (175)  

Integral Community Building & Collaboration Ecology 03

Posted on Dec 12th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin

Collaboration and competition

The dominant collective culture in most parts of the world today is a star culture in which "the winner takes it all; the loser has to fall" (Abba). In today's economic world business leaders, entrepreneurs, CEOs, brokers, financiers etc, are typically regarded as some kind of star, even though the accomplishment and profit of any organisation or business is obviously created by everybody engaged in it. Yet this is easily forgotten in a world that still holds on to the industrial age's basic story of the machine -- the organisation as a machine sees people as wheels and cogs which can be easily exchanged, as human resource. So only the star-wheels in the top of the business (or in politics, media or almost any organisation) are seen and honoured. Promoting a business leader as a star may produce a momentary marketing and monetary advantage, but in the long run collaboration creates a much greater and most of all a sustainable business value. And what is more the collaboration we are indicating here produces true value, beyond monetization and mere measurement, it produces social coherence and community: collaboration harnesses collective intelligence and produces wealth in every respect. Contrary to the myths our star culture perpetuate, people working in collaboration not only achieve far greater and sustainable successes than individuals, even if we narrow down the meaning of success to be solely economic, but they also master the fundamental challenge of exponentially growing diversity and complexity.

It is often said that we can only grow through maximum competition and it could seem that my view of a collaborative culture would therefore oppose competition and star culture, but this is not so. Collaboration just surpasses competition in every respect except ego-gratification. It is a major step beyond egotism, nepotism, feudalism and any vertical leadership structure -- not to mention bureaucracy and adolescent's games. All of these are rooted in pyramidal systems where the many carry and enrich those on the next, narrower level and compete to become one of them. But the competitive star-culture, which by the way cannot but privatize profit and gain and socialise losses and waste -- the dreadful state of our common environment is a dreadful example of this inevitable consequence of that culture -- cannot create true common wealth and it cannot rise to the challenges we face globally and locally everywhere on this planet.

Recently a new term has come to my notice: 'collapetition' combining the words collaboration and competition in an attempt to go beyond the antagonism that seems to reside in these two terms. But what is expressing itself here is already incorporated in the view on collaboration as I regard it since collaboration doesn't mean that all participating partners in it refrain from jostling and struggling for best possible procedures, processes, practises and solutions to the challenges we are facing. When collaborations are formed there always are deliberations, discussions, dialogues and sometimes passionate communication until understanding, vision and purpose is achieved in mutual understanding.

Collaboration incorporates non-exclusionary competition on all level and in all stages: In any inquiring, deliberating and deciding process many views or propositions are inspected and compete with other views. Likewise individuals and teams/groups with a collaborative endeavour can -- and often do -- pursue diverse lines or processes to add value to the overall effort.

_________________
Part 1
Part 2
Part 4
Part 5
Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print views (265)  

Integral Community Building & Collaboration Ecology - 04

Posted on Dec 18th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin

Collaborating for Community

underwater circle

Collaboration that creates and applies knowledge, understanding and eventually wisdom to create real community is very sophisticated behaviour. Apart from subject matter expertise, skills, competence and experience -- which are basic to competitive endeavours as well -- the communities of practice that Community Development Professionals build require agreement and shared values, trust among individuals and organizations, and the efficient, full sharing of ideas,
information, practises and processes. It rests upon the participants' alignment with common intentions and works towards realizing a common purpose, goal or vision which is typically creative or innovative in nature.

As much as it is true that community development -- being a dynamic, interdependent process with a diversity of participants -- can be learned only through experience, it is also true that there are environments and processes that greatly enhance this learning. As a complex[1], and because of the required trust, potentially fragile process it needs a safe surrounding to germinate. Professional community development can really only be achieved properly by people who have matured sufficiently beyond the need for personal stardom (egotism), and who have understood that collaboration requires equal respect of all for all. Resilient, sustainable communities can best be regarded as voluntary, self-managing processes that can only be encouraged and facilitated -- there will most likely never be standardized practices beyond the creation of an ecology of values, purposes and principles that foster collaboration and the personal contact with and facilitation by a Community Development Professional. The replicability of this process lies in the education of and in sufficient support structures for Community Development Professionals.

Community development starts with rediscovering or creating common ground: shared experiences and/or values, intentions, visions. The environment in which it develops easily is one of being attentively and open-mindedly present to others, giving authentic feedback and "being yourself", expecting others to likewise be; a willingness to accept differences in perspective, perception and opinion. This is relatively easy once a deep mutual understanding of "our commonality of intention, vision and value" has taken root.

To use economic terms, "Developing community requires ongoing investments in intangible assets over extensive periods of time." Building trust, which is the major ingredient of effective and successful communities, takes time as does creating an atmosphere or ecology of common values, purpose and all the other hard to measure human traits that community is made of. Â Engaging conversations that connect people and are the stuff relationships are mostly made of; developing community is an investment in people and their creativity and inventiveness and it involves unpredictable outcomes. Developing communities that have real value -- if it is regarded as an actual financial investment done by one or more stakeholders -- is a challenging 'business' and should be well considered beforehand. However, the economic results are definitely measurable as they demonstrate reduced risks, faster performance and greater or new sources of revenues; and solving organisational, social and environmental challenges through the application of collective wisdom, challenges that, if not handled properly, easily can cause substantial economic losses.



Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 5

[1] Actually the process of collaboration is only complex when regarded through analytical and linear lenses. When regarded from within a collaborating entity it is a naturally unfolding emergent dynamic system which is often better regarded as a work of art -- practical beauty is a term that comes to mind; a beauty that is easily seen in a natural landscape or ecology.


Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print views (302)  

Integral Community Building & Collaboration Ecology - 05

Posted on Dec 19th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin
gehirnzellen

Economic Opportunities for Communities

Encouraging, facilitating and fostering pluralistic conversations and action for a flourishing planet and society in an environment of exponentially increasing social diversity and complexity on all scales, this is the larger purpose Community Development Professionals stand for. To fulfill this purpose we focus, beyond the traditional economic capital, on social, cultural and environmental capital and co-creating it in a new abundance become its stewards. Doing this we will surely craft and foster new types of organizations and communities that provide innovative solutions to environmental and societal challenges, organizations that also create large economic profits because the world-market is ready for them.

According to an Edelman study[1] published Nov 15, 2007, 85% of the consumers around the world are willing to change the brands they buy or their consumption habits to make tomorrow's world a better place, and over half (55%) would help a brand 'promote' a product if a good cause were behind it.

Obviously brands aligning themselves with a good purpose that consumers care about will strike a meaningful chord. An innovative brand with a collaborative structure, a community using its collective intelligence and creating products and services that reflect the developing needs of the global community are certainly the coming economic and societal winners -- actually win-win-winners as they cater to the triple bottom-line of economic, societal and environmental profit. Areas that according to the Edelman study are of greatest concern to people wishing to spend money, inventiveness and energy are "protecting the environment" (92%); "enabling everyone to live a healthy life" (90%); "reducing poverty" (89%); "equal opportunity to education" (89%); "fighting HIV/AIDS" (83%); "building understanding/respect for other cultures" (82%); "helping to raise people's self-esteem" (77%); and "supporting the creative arts" (69%). Products and services in these areas, created by organizations and communities that have the above mentioned structure and uses collaborative processes will belong to the strongest assets in the economic processes of the 21st century.

The "business" of the communities and organizations Community Development Professionals help develop, be they non-profit or for profit or, most likely, a mix of both is creating economic, societal/cultural and environmental wealth. The measurement of success of these "collaborative enterprises" is a positive triple bottom-line.[2]

Yet the "climate of hope" that results from the success of these novel forms of working and making profit will be the largest asset; we will be able to say, "It can be done, we can live on a healthy planet in flourishing, open societies that care." And eventually we will be looking back to this time and age as "The Age when we made the Turn."



Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4

 1] http://www.edelman.com/news/ShowOne.asp?ID=172

[2] What exactly will bet he criteria of the societal/cultural and the environmental comonents of this bottom-line? Surely the equitable participation of all who contribute to the final product or service, a good work-climate (people love going to work!) and all the already available measurements of ecological sustainability will be part of this equasion.
Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print views (487)  

Dancing With Systems

Posted on Dec 30th, 2007 by Mushin : We-full Mushin
from Systems - We-Space

Dancing With Systems by Donella Meadows.
Versions of this piece have been published in Whole Earth, winter 2001 and The Systems Thinker, Vol. 13, No. 2 (March 2002).

1. Get the beat.
2. Expose your mental models to the open air.
3. Stay humble. Stay a learner.
4. Honor and protect information.
5. Locate responsibility in the system.
6. Make feedback policies for feedback systems.
7. Pay attention to what is important, not just what is quantifiable.
8. Go for the good of the whole.
9. Expand time horizons.
10.Expand thought horizons.
11. Expand the boundary of caring.
12. Celebrate complexity.
13. Hold fast to the goal of goodness.

Access_public Access: Public 2 Comments Print views (250)